Quote:
I think the focus in this thread is too much on a Laptop and not enough on a Portable EFIKA.
I completely agree with Johan. IMHO, it doesn't matter if it's a laptop or a portable, as long as it is really "portable", ie light and small. For example, the imac series is very successful just because of this reason (plus it's sexy and cheap :-) ). It's very easy to transport in big volumes (eg. a company buying imacs for its customers), or to carry around from your home to your resort, etc.
I think the imac-style design is the way to go. A laptop offers extra difficulty in packing all of the components in extra small space. An imac is small but offers slightly more freedom in the design and arranging of the components, which means lower costs.
Quote:
Secondly, this is initially not intended to be a consumer product; more like a specialized tool.
One of the ideas we have is to build information kiosks (for banks, tourist info, email access, ...), which will use some of the technologies of the portable EFIKA at its core.
While I agree that this is definately a target marget for a portable efika, I don't think we should rule out the consumer/business target markets. Esp. the thin client solution, in which the efika is already a player.
Quote:
The advantage would be the power consumption: being able to deliver stunning graphical interfaces with very little power consumption is a key benefit for the markets we have in mind.
In terms of power consumption, I think we might want to offer even some form of power autonomy features, like a solar power supply that plugs directly into the portable -ie, without requiring extra conversion into 110/220V output. This way, the efika should pave the way into markets that right now have zero penetration from other products -eg. schools in Africa that have no power connection around.
As for the OS, I think Linux is the obvious choice. Apart from some embedded/special uses, MorphOS would not sell to the general public, imho.
Konstantinos