Quote:
So I got a MAC like 60:2f:0b:00:00:00 ..reported by kernel and ifconfig.
Strange, I didn't get that. You can always fix it to give the right order though.
Is this a solution for you now? Do you really need a new firmware now that a two-line fix does it all for you?
By the way this kind of hackability is exactly why we chose Open Firmware and keep pushing it now. U-Boot isn't nearly as flexible (certainly not programmatically as efika.forth or pegasos.forth is) - you can change the MAC address, sure, but can you do it based on the environment and device tree? No :)
I am working on a pegasos.forth update which fixes the MAC address and also pushes these values into the device tree (I worked out a clever hack based on the mac-address word which returns a 6-byte string "Bogus!" - you can overwrite it and then use it the word again directly as input to encode-bytes)
Quote:
So if I'd kill my system because of using beta firmware, I'd never come up with the idea to ask for free support.
We still don't like people using beta firmwares for the OTHER pertinent reason that while it may make life easier under certain circumstances it makes testing Linux and MorphOS support absolutely impossible.
I don't even run the beta firmware. Nobody on the MorphOS team does. Peter does, Olaf Hering at SUSE does; I wish they would stop, though, because they simply are not seeing the problems the rest of the world have, and therefore are not motivated to produce solutions for 99.999% of the users out there who run the 20040811 firmware.