Hi all.
Some issues I would like to address after reading through these replies and on some other sites.
- The idea is to build this while keeping the whole thing affordable. If we start adding features, better screens, etc. it won't be cheap enough and no-one will buy it.
- Keeping the cost of the components in general low means the production will be cheaper (smaller PCB's, cheaper BOM, ...)
Production in low quantity is always expensive, so we should make sure we can deliver something that is viable, without dreaming too much about what we could do given infinite time and money.
- For this reason, a TTL interface to the screen is preferable, as it is less complex than adding LVDS support. Debugging time will be shorter, and the product can be shipped faster.
- Screens are expensive. Actually, they are cheap if you buy lots. However in quantities below 1000 (or even 10000+), they are much more expensive. The added problem is the CCFL backlight and the required inverter, etc. A LED backlight would be better, but after doing some research, they are very hard to come by.
For now, the best option is a 800x600 screen, but that does not mean that a future version might not have a larger screen, more features, etc.
As a conclusion: this project has to work out. We have some real nice markets in mind for this system, most of which do not need OSD, 1024x768, etc. They do have to be power conservative and they just have to work, even in harsh conditions (I'm thinking desert here...).
For this reason, the design has to be as simple as possible, robust, and cheap enough to produce in low quantities. These are some serious restrictions under which to develop for.
Best regards,
Johan
_________________
Johan Dams, Genesi USA Inc.
Director, Software Engineering
Yep, I have a blog...
PurpleAlienPlanet