All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:22 am 
Offline


Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am

1063
<sarcasm> Well, it would come quite handy in the winter. In Hungary natural gas is used primarily for heating, and with the current tendencies in oil (and this way natural gas) prices it will be cheaper to buy and run a couple of PowerStations, than to continue using natural gas :-D </sarcasm>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin


Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am

1589

Alamo Heights, TX
mattmatteh wrote:
funny, they say its an ideal replacement for an apple powermac g5, but its the same thing. 100 watts per cpu :(


I think the idea is that anyone who had a dual-processor Mac G5 or one of the lower end Quad G5 systems, can buy this and get the very top end possible.

That assumes that it isn't $4000 for a base system (it shouldn't be, but I bet it will be more money than anyone here is willing to spend on it) and all the customers have a problem buying Mac G5 systems on eBay or through refurb companies so much so that they need a brand new system that won't run MacOS..
Matt Sealey, Genesi USA Inc.
Product Development Analyst


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:45 am 
Offline


Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:08 pm

99

Germany
If PowerPC hardware are available, MacOS will run on it. That's what I'm hoping.
Sie MacOS x86.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:00 pm 
Offline


Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:26 am

342

Nafplion
Karl wrote:
If PowerPC hardware are available, MacOS will run on it. That's what I'm hoping.
Sie MacOS x86.


You're hoping for Apple to continue the upgrades for MacOS X/ppc? You're very optimistic :)
Konstantinos Margaritis
Senior Software Engineer, NEON optimizations
Genesi USA Inc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:29 pm 
Offline


Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am

429

Secure Networks / Sweden
Leopard should be the last PowerPC-compatible Mac OS.

I don't think Snow Leopard will run on PowerPC.

They list both Multi-core and 64-bit as major features.
The most sold PowerPC-CPU for Mac (G4) is neither..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:59 pm 
Offline


Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:37 am

5
They've posted information now (though none on power consumption): http://terrasoftsolutions.com/products/ ... down.shtml

It is the same CPUs as the G5 Quad (2 x 2.5 GHz 970MP), but the rest of the hardware is substantially better. There are serial SCSI hard drives, serial console support, DDR2-667, and HT2000 instead of HT1000 southbridge.

Given that, it is actually fairly reasonably priced ($1895 US), especially considering that it comes with a 70 GB SAS drive, which is several hundred dollars alone. This is out of my budget, but substantially cheaper than the G5 Quads on eBay.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:14 pm 
Offline


Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:26 am

342

Nafplion
nwhitehorn wrote:
Given that, it is actually fairly reasonably priced ($1895 US), especially considering that it comes with a 70 GB SAS drive, which is several hundred dollars alone. This is out of my budget, but substantially cheaper than the G5 Quads on eBay.


Exactly. Why would anyone need SAS given the speed of current SATA 2 drives? It also increases cost substantially. If they left it as an optional addon and included SATA it would seriously take the price down down to $1500 perhaps (sans disk+controller).
Konstantinos Margaritis
Senior Software Engineer, NEON optimizations
Genesi USA Inc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm 
Offline


Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:30 am

43
markos wrote:
nwhitehorn wrote:
Given that, it is actually fairly reasonably priced ($1895 US), especially considering that it comes with a 70 GB SAS drive, which is several hundred dollars alone. This is out of my budget, but substantially cheaper than the G5 Quads on eBay.


Exactly. Why would anyone need SAS given the speed of current SATA 2 drives? It also increases cost substantially. If they left it as an optional addon and included SATA it would seriously take the price down down to $1500 perhaps (sans disk+controller).


My guess is that IBM is going to sell remaining stock of unsellable IntelliStation Pro series this way. And SAS drives are just there...

Karel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:04 pm 
Offline


Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am

429

Secure Networks / Sweden
" Power requirements 220/110V A/C; 815 Watt 12V bulk power supply"

Now THAT is a powerful PSU..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:41 pm 
Offline


Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am

111
@ironfist:

PowerMac had 1000 Watt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 2:53 am 
Offline


Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am

429

Secure Networks / Sweden
That is really extreme..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:17 am 
Offline


Sat Aug 12, 2006 1:08 pm

99

Germany
markos wrote:
Karl wrote:
If PowerPC hardware are available, MacOS will run on it. That's what I'm hoping.
Sie MacOS x86.


You're hoping for Apple to continue the upgrades for MacOS X/ppc? You're very optimistic :)


Who has said such a thing??? I'm talking about a hack like the osx86project.
Any further OS X revisions won't support PowerPC for sure.

Oh, and the PowerStation is the IBM prototype:
http://blemings.org/hugh/blog/blosxom.c ... #20080610a


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:24 pm 
Offline


Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:30 am

43
Karl wrote:
Oh, and the PowerStation is the IBM prototype:
http://blemings.org/hugh/blog/blosxom.c ... #20080610a


Interesting, anyway "it's a limited production run" so let's hurry up to purchase one... :-)

Karel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:42 pm 
Offline


Sat Mar 15, 2008 4:57 pm

84

near chicago
ill wait for something a little more efficient :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:30 pm 
Offline


Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am

111
>ill wait for something a little more efficient :)

Unfortunately, P.A. Semi's PWRficient is out of the picture.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group