All times are UTC-06:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Marvell SheevaPlug
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:43 am
Posts: 38
Location: France
Any comment about this new device ?

http://www.marvell.com/products/embedde ... vaplug.jsp


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am
Posts: 1066
Looks nice! Could be easily transformed into a NAS or a cheap IP camera or into a data collecting station. I just found about it on LinuxDevices, got the URL from two of my friends and now also here :-)

_________________
CzP
http://czanik.blogs.balabit.com/


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:04 pm
Posts: 21
Location: Ohio
Any CPU benchmarks compared to Cortex-A8?

Also, from a datasheet on that chip, looks like the CPU core takes 870 mW @ 1.2GHz. IIRC, Cortex-A8 takes ~450 mW @ 1GHz.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:56 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 1:39 am
Posts: 1589
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Any CPU benchmarks compared to Cortex-A8?

Also, from a datasheet on that chip, looks like the CPU core takes 870 mW @ 1.2GHz. IIRC, Cortex-A8 takes ~450 mW @ 1GHz.
The performance should be broadly similar however I can't be sure because I can't work out what ARM architecture the Sheeva is meant to be based on. Let's assume ARM9 or ARM11 - this is an out-of-order core, then, so it may get the snip on the Cortex-A8 (the doubled power consumption seems to support that).

The i.MX515 (and Qualcomm's SnapDragon if you need another example) have built-in video though and quite possibly far better video decoders (and encoders, the Kirkwood diagram here seems to state MPEG_TS and audio which isn't too descriptive) so you may put the Sheeva processor definitely in the realms of communications and storage application area, and not the mobile entertainment area the i.MX515 (and SnapDragon) take on.

The fact that there are so many ARM chips out with roughly the same applications and roughly the same featuresets really makes me wish PowerPC was pushed harder. Freescale and IBM and AMCC had a hold on a market with strict licensing that meant they were the only people to go to for a certain class of processor (this is exemplified in the game console market where PowerPC is dominating, although Nintendo do have an ARM7 core in the southbridge).

Now if they all use ARM chips, any one of the competitors in the "ARM(s) Race" could supplant any other in any device at any time. Would you trade off millions of units sold for the risk that you would lose that customer after those millions of units? (this is exemplified by the iPod which has gone through double digit revisions and generations, nearly every one using some other chip - PortalPlayer probably though they had a sweet deal with the iPod Gen 1-4 but then Apple picked Samsung and Broadcom instead)

You know I should really be blogging this stuff :]

_________________
Matt Sealey


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:04 pm
Posts: 21
Location: Ohio
IIRC, it's an ARMv5 ISA right now, FWIW.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC-06:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
PowerDeveloper.org: Copyright © 2004-2012, Genesi USA, Inc. The Power Architecture and Power.org wordmarks and the Power and Power.org logos and related marks are trademarks and service marks licensed by Power.org.
All other names and trademarks used are property of their respective owners. Privacy Policy
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group